The sub category I research under politics was the first amendment. This topic interested me because although the first amendment is essential to our constitution not a lot of us know the first amendment, myself included. There are many reasons why the general public might now really know the first amendment, I for one believe it has to do with the fact that the rights given to us by the first amendment are wildly accepted and understood. We believe the freedoms granted to us by the first amendment are essential and as human being we are all entitled to such rights, however this is not true. I researched country such as Cuba and North Korea who have not constituted nor enforce any laws to protect their people’s freedom of speech, press, religion, petition or assembly.
Our first amendment is fundamental. Without our first amendment the government could very possibly establish a national religion thus causing minority religions to be persecuted. Protesters would be silenced, press would be punished for criticizing the government and its officials. Citizens would not be allowed to mobilize in push for social change. The first amendment was written and adopted to guarantee and enforce our basic human freedoms. When our Constitution was signed in the year 1787 it did not have these crucial freedoms, which are not outlined in our Bill of Rights. The first amendment if composed of 45 words which were written by James Madison.
The first amendment is composed of five basic freedoms. The freedoms granted to us by this amendment are the freedom of speech, press, religion, petition and assembly. Speech, it is our right to speak our minds without being punished by the government, this does not simply encompass oral expression. Speech includes photography, dress code, painting, dancing, song writing and any other form of self-expression. Secondly we have the right to publish and make information or opinions available to the mass media. This included several outlets and the government should not interfere. We can publish newspapers, newsletter, blogs, cds, dvds, etc. Having this freedom of press in conclusion leads us as the public to discover the truth, it facilitates our participation in making political decisions, as well as keeping a check on abuse of governmental power. One article I read sums up in a few words why freedom of press is so important “Protecting the freedom of press protects your right to know”. Freedom of religion, this grants us the right to practice any religion of our choice or choose not to part take in any religion. Religious freedom is composed of two main clauses. First being the establishment clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or giving preference to any religion in particular. Secondly the free exercise clause states that government cannot limit or control religious actions or rituals. Ultimately these clause are intended to keep and maintain church and state two very separate entities. Freedom of petition consist of people having the right to appeal to the government for or against policies that might affect them or simply a topic they feel very strongly about. Finally the freedom of assembly, granting people the right to gather in public to assemble protest, marches and demonstrations.
Based on the video shown by Jimmy Kimmble and the number of people in the class who knew the first amendment previous to my presentation I concluded not many of us know our rights. Many know they are free
The First Amendment Freedom is being breached all over the U.S and most of it is being taken away from the press. Sure the Patriot Act is killing everyone's privacy in secrecy all over the US, but journalists and reporters are being put in jail right and left. The government has infringed on their rights in a way that should not be with the first amendment. It seems like the more people let the government do, the more steps the government takes to take first amendment rights from people. For…
The First Amendment’s Right of Religion The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Janda 458). The Establishment Clause prohibits laws establishing religion and the FreeExercise Clause prevents the government from interfering with the exercise of religion (458). The Supreme Court cases Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) and Employment Division V. Smith (1989) are two cases that are based on the…
106 11 February 2013 First Amendment Many people reflect their First Amendment rights, being one of the most important amendments. The First Amendment is very broad and confuses many Americans about how it applies and when it doesn’t. Detailed exploration through discussion and reading essays on the First Amendment increases one’s understanding of how the First Amendment works along with real-life experiences. The clause on freedom of religion in the First Amendment is probably the most difficult…
as though they are not being violated when they really are. The First Amendment (I) of the United States of America’s Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” In all this Amendment gives the U.S. people the right to to not have religion forced upon…
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of free speech and freedom of the press among other things. In general, this is a relatively simple proposition, but it does become complicated when rights of one person conflict with the rights of another person. It is my position that even if the rights of privacy of some people are hindered, freedom of speech and the press must be maintained. Freedom of the press, and dissemination of information, is not particularly different…
The First Amendment Becker, P. J., Byers, B., & Jipson, A. (2000). The contentious american debate: The first amendment and internet-based hate speech. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 14(1), 33-41. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213408025?accountid=34899 In this essay it discussed the debate over what constituted hate speech and whether or not such speech is protected by the American First Amendment. The article…
The First Ten Amendment The first amendment, which addresses the freedom of speech, press, religion, and petition, is vital for an individual’s development for self-expression. Freedom of speech allows you to say whatever you want, to whomever you want to without getting in trouble. However, there are certain things you are not to say. For example, some things that might hurt someone or things that are suppose to be confidential for example government secrets. Freedom of press allows people to…
Due to years of ambiguity, the First Amendment has become the most scrutinized and analyzed part of the original Bill of Rights. When evaluating the "freedom of speech" clause and the many ways to appraise individual decisions, judgments are often based on previous cases of the same nature, categorically or otherwise. Three distinctly different situations surrounding Jill Smith, all pertain to freedom of speech, each having their own very specific details. These specific details are the reason Judges…
Hate Groups in the United States and First Amendment Rights The First Amendment of the United States Constitution was written to protect the right of freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression consists of the freedom of speech, press and assembly, the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief ( First Amendment). The First Amendment prevents Congress from making any l…
Espionage Act saying in times of war speech and expression was less protected. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, with the Socialists asserting that they had been denied their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and press. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote courts opinion and rejected the First Amendment argument, creating what is called the clear and present danger test. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes considered this to be latent with the prospect of immediate danger, threat and harm…