In March, 2013, the Federal Government proposed a new employment skills
training program called the Canada Job Grant. The program would provide subsidy
grants of up to $15,000 for training people who are unemployed with the help of
employers. Its purpose would be to train unemployed and underemployed
Canadians for available jobs. Originally the federal government proposed that they
would pay one-third of the cost. This would leave the provinces and employers to
pay the remaining two-thirds. The provinces had a hard time budgeting for this
program, and as a result the Federal Government decided they would pay the
provinces share. The new Canada Job Grant will be funded with $300 million taken
from current transfers for workplace literacy and essential skills training provided
to provinces and territories through Labour Market Agreements(LMA) . The federal
government has provided $500 million annually through the LMA Agreement since
2008/9. This replaced LMA with provinces and territories, which also provided
funding for literacy, essential workplace skills and other skills development. In the
first two years of these programs they reached 550,000 Canadians. Therefor, the
government wants to create jobs by cutting funding for a training program to pay
for another. Right from the beginning the provinces were skeptical over the deal, but
as the year went on, they started to despise the deal. First of all the provinces see
this deal as a jurisdictional issue with the government over who has the
constitutional right over these matters. They also don’t want lose money transfers
they already receive from the government. These cuts can mean Quebec would loose
up to $70 million in money transfers from the government to train unemployed low skilled Quebecers. You can see why this program is so difficult for the government to
implement. Employers are also not confident in this new deal. The costs they would
have to pay are too high and too risky especially for smaller firms. They have no
guarantee they would receive quality employees for their efforts. Basically are the
costs for such an investment worth it for employers? Businesses don’t have the
incentive to train Canadians who need the sills to work for them. The government is
misguided on their desire to provide skills for people who really need the
opportunity to be part of the Canadian workforce. They need to step aside and the
let the provinces use the money to help the people in in their jurisdictions. Every
province is facing a unique situation that are different from each other. Therefore
the provinces are the experts on how to use the money. First I will examine the
background and issue at hand. Followed by the final proposal of the government.
Then I will analyze the shortage of skilled workers. Finally there will be a section on
the lack of essential skills.
Issue:
In March, the federal government announced a new method to their investments in
skills training. An employer-driven Canada Job Grant, they reasoned, would provide
a better way to prepare Canadians for available jobs.1 After all, this should be their
prime focus, and they should use all resources at their disposal to help marginalized
Canadians. It sounds rational, but the reality is not so simple. As experts and
analysts have rightly pointed out, the federal government’s proposal raises a lot of
concerns; namely, the new grant would be funded by cutting transfers to provinces
and leaving out many of the most vulnerable workers who receive training from
programs funded through these transfers.2 Ironically these jobs are being filled by
foreign temporary workers or are being unfilled. It’s not surprising that the
provinces are opposed to a proposal that threatens programs they know already
work. Although the provinces raise a great point, we should not discount the
over choices of gov. Examples in America today Initiatives: procedure by which voters can propose a law Referenda: policies are referred by elected officials to the voters for approval or disapproval Recall: dismiss elected official from before term has expired Pluralist Democracy: Citizens participate in government through groups Republican Form of Democracy: Retains the ultimate power over the government with the people, but policy decisions are made by elected officials. Chapter…
POLS 2300 – Canadian Politics and Governance Exam Notes Multiple Choice (30) and Essay Section (2/3) MC will cover the chapter after the second quiz (Pages 311-340; Chapters 4, 13-16) Essay topics revolve around: (1) Party Systems, (2) Federalism, (3) Aboriginal Rights and Freedom, (4) Policies? Pages 311-340: Parties and Elections (Chapter 10) 2000 Election: The 2000 election was called for no better reason than what appeared to be its winnability (by the Canadian Alliance) – Stockwell Day…
Court History and Purpose Paper Stacey A. McGowan University of Phoenix- Online Court History and Purpose Paper A court in general is defined as an organization or unit of the legal extension of government, approved or made by statute or constitution, and comprising of one or more legal officers, which has the power to choose cases, discussions in law, and question matters of certainty brought before it. There are three different components which include the following: To be viewed as a court…
more interested in politics . Having been raised by a father ardent federalist convictions , and then grew up in a similar environment in their living room as a student at Dartmouth, Daniel Webster , as many people in New England , both in favor of federalism in the United States . Consistently, approved a series of minor cases where federalists argued the cause. After the death of his father in 1806 , Webster began his legal practice in his older brother Ezekiel , who at that time had finished his…
02/09/2012 Assessor to complete Assessor’s name: Max Halupka Mark: 88 /100 Essay on Federalism OR Accountability Leon, This is an excellent assignment, one that you should be very proud of. Starting with an impressive introduction, you outline…
Amendment Right of trial by jury in civil cases. 8th Amendment Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments. 9th Amendment Other rights of the people. 10th Amendment Powers reserved to the states. 11th Amendment 12th Amendment Max 2 terms in office for president, or 10 years, reaction to FDR 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery. 14th Amendment Clauses: privilege & immunities, Due process, equal protection, Citizenship Clause Incorporation Doctrine – Legal concept which the S.C. nationalized…
David Canales Political Science 10/12/13 Research Paper #1 The original constitution may not have intended to, but did in fact, create a hyperplurist government. The national government was designed to represent a wide variety of interests, yet failed to give the necessary incentives for bargaining and compromising. While this hyperplurist system allowed for freedom, it provided either equality…
conclusion that there might be a Federal government. The Articles, on the other hand, neglected to require distinctive States to help reserve the Federal (National) government, a pattern for an Executive and National Judicial Branch, or the issuance of paper cash and a central banking system. Basically, the biggest disappointment was the Articles' failure to permit a Federal government to control business, charge, or encroach laws upon the States. As a position of power, the huge, populated States pressed…
amend or void those acts of another that fall within its purview. Separation of Powers The principle or system of vesting in separate branches the executive,legislative, and judicial powers of a government. Advantages/disadvantages of federalism Advantage (1) Suited to large geographical area because it encourages diversity in local government. Advantage (2) Avoids concentration of political power Advantage (3) Accommodated already existing state governments Advantage (4) States serve as training grounds for national leaders…
missions of government in the constitution of the United States are popular sovereignty, Checks and Balances, Federalism, Limited power of Government, Separation of Government. Popular sovereignty means the ultimate power rest with the people. Checks and Balances mean no one branch of government can overpower the other branches of government. Each had a check on the other power of branches. Federalism is the dividing and sharing of power between state and national government. Limited power means that the…