Boy In The Striped Pyjamas Film Review
Director: Mark Herman
Cast: (Bruno), (Shmuel), (Mother), (Father,) (Gretel, (Lieutenant Kotler)
Review: Set in the Second World War, The boy in The Striped Pyjamas gives the viewer a frightful and fascinating perspective of the Nazi and the Jews through the eyes of a wealthy and powerful Nazi commander’s son, Bruno. Through the eyes of nine year old Bruno, the Jewish prisoners and his newly made friend Shmuel appear to be farmers working on the opposite side of the fence.
The film is quite shocking to the viewer because it contrasts extreme discrimination to the point of murdering millions of people, who the Nazi’s call “imperfect”, with the simple and accepting views of a nine year old child. Bruno’s innocence of the concentration camp is clearly demonstrated when he decides to help his friend Shmuel, and explore the land of where he lives.
Overall they don’t change the plot very much. But of course there are a few differences. I think the biggest difference between the book and the film is Bruno’s father. In the film he seems to be much kinder and concentrates more on his family, but in the novel he’s a more distant and cold person, whose life revolves around his job.
Some scenes have been removed and changed a little bit in the movie. In the book there is an odd chapter which tells about the Fury coming for dinner in the family’s home in Berlin to discuss the
The Boy In Striped Pajamas: A Movie Analysis The film is an emotional experience highlighting the tragedy of innocence, using the point of view of an eight-year-old German boy to expose the raw psychological devastation of the era. It's an unnerving film with a knockout punch for an ending, but it feels more acceptable as an educational piece than a profoundly rewarding work of drama. This movie is based on a book that goes by the same name, The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, written by John Boyne…
unlikeliest friends during the war. The story starts off with a nineyearold boy named Bruno and his family. They have just moved from their lovely home in Berlin to a new house in an unfamiliar place called Auschwitz. There are places where Bruno is not allowed to go but being a nineyearold boy he can not help himself. One day, he wanders into an area where he is not allowed to go and sees a fence. He follows the fence and finds a boy around his age sitting on the floor named Shmuel and this is the…
also the son of a Nazi commandant becoming friends with a Jewish inmate from a concentration camp. It all began when Bruno and his family had to move because of his fathers’ job. The new home was very different and quite an adjustment. To adjust to the new environment, Bruno wanted to explore. One day while adventuring, he comes across a fence. On the other side of the fence was the boy in the striped pajamas (Shmuel). Bruno becomes good friends with Shmuel and starts to visit him more frequently.…
THEME 1.friendship between Bruno and Shmuel When Bruno and Shmuel were in the gas chamber,Bruno said to Shmuel that “You’re my best friend,Shmuel.My best friend for life.”This shows in Bruno’s mind,because he was so young and naive,he didn’t see Shmuel as a Jew or enemy.He just treat Shmuel as a boy like him.In his heart,they were equal and their friendship so strong that it won everything. 2.family——Maria’s family. Maria’s mother was a dresser and worked for Bruno’s grandmother.Maria told Bruno…
This family was tossed forcefully, some willing and some not, from a beautiful and care-free environment, into a new one that did not feel, or could ever feel, like the home they were used to. The atmosphere of their new location was bland, and close-quartered. At the beginning of the film, Bruno had the ability to freely play with his friends out in the public streets, like a normal kid. But when the family relocated for his fathers promotion, the farthest he was allowed to wander off to was the…
the consequences of the war. You could even say he does not witness anything about it except that he was forced to move to another place, but even that he does not really relate to the war. The most important thing for him is his friendship with Shmuel, which is a very uncommon one and the two boys could not be any more different. Although they cannot play together, they are satisfied by just talking while sitting vis-à-vis each other. Sometimes Bruno says very inappropriate things, like the one…
this time period but I love listening to my grandma’s stories about when she was growing up. I always find it fascinating listening to her stories about how it was in the forties, fifties, and how it is in our society. One of my grandmas’ closest friends growing up fought in the war. His name was Edward Crow but everyone called him Ed. Ed lived to be 94 years old, and was one of the nicest toughest people I’ve meet. He did not like talking too much about the war, but one of the things he said to…
Here the audience is able to feel the fear of the family when Bruno is lost, the horror of the gas chambers and the brutality of the guards. The film moves very quickly from shot to shot causing fear and suspense, even the rain helps create the forbidding atmosphere. On the other hand the scenes in "What Happened the Next Day" are much more gentle and concentrate on the friendship of Bruno and Shmuel. John Boyne relies on creating loving, peaceful ending for the two friends. The cruelty of the Nazis…
and that they could have just been born to different parents and had massively different lives. I think Boyne is trying to show that it is senseless to separate these people and treat one as sub-human when they are very similar to one another and Shmuel has done nothing wrong. The fence that separates them is symbolic as on each side there sits a very similar nine-year old boy, but they are not allowed to cross over and the things that happen on one side are massively different to those that happen…
dragged Pavel into the kitchen to beat him up privately’, confirmed through diegetic sound confiming that absence of happiness is directly linked to a lack equalityallowing us to conjure up our own response to the differing responses of Bruno and his families responses to physical violence. The concept of belonging to death and resulting un happiness is paralleled in both texts. ‘Sal opens her hand and lets the broken piece of tile from Wapping New Stairs fall onto the grave of her dead child’, symbollising…