SAMPLE PURSUASIVE ESSAY – Take note of the structure and the use of techniques
Creationism Should not be Taught in School Science Classes as an Alternative to Evolution.
My view is that creationism is not a science, it is a belief. Because it is a belief it has no place being taught as a science, and hence does not belong in a science classroom. I will not only show that creationism is wrong, but also that evolution is the only reasonable explanation for the development of life.
There is no physical or scientific evidence that supports the beliefs of creationism, while there is a vast amount of evidence from a wide range of sciences that together point to the evolution over time of life on Earth. The many disciplines of science that have contributed to the formulation of the theory of evolution include geology, botany, chemistry, taxonomy, molecular biology, genetics, palaeontology, nuclear physics and biochemistry to name a few. These have contributed thousands of articles in peer-reviewed journals to painstakingly describe how the forces of natural selection have shaped the character and nature of life over billions of years.
Furthermore, evolution has provided a framework for understanding the complex interrelationships found between living things and no study of biology can be coherent without an understanding of evolution as its overriding principle. The overwhelming majority of specialists in their scientific fields support evolution as a fact.
It has recently become common for religious groups to call for creationism (or ‘Intelligent Design’ as it is now called) to be recognised as having scientific support, but this is not as convincing as it seems. As the theory most supported by scientists, the onus of proof is on the creationists to show why a hundred years of solid science is now believed to be faulty. They have convincingly failed to do so.
One of the fundamental flaws of creationism is that is begins with the assumption that a creator is responsible for life on earth, that the earth is around 6000 years old, and that the theory of evolution is wrong. It then tries to find evidence to support these views. Apart from the fact that no evidence to support this combination of assumptions exists, it is not how science is done. Science does not assume an outcome before the evidence suggests it. Beliefs about the world come from the results of experiments and reasoning, i.e. as the end point of inquiry, not the starting point.
Science is also ‘falsifiable’, meaning we should be able to give examples of what would disprove a theory. This is simple in evolution. For example, if the remains of a fossilised human were to be found in the same rock layer as a fossilised dinosaur, with no obvious distortion of the surrounding rock, then that would count as evidence against evolution, which clearly states the humans did not exist at the time of dinosaurs. Or if any one of the many dating techniques that scientists employ were to consistently give the same age for organisms that were supposed separated by millions of years, then this would count against evolution. Creationism allows for no such procedure. Faced with countless examples of evidence supporting an old earth, or of the gradual evolution of animals as shown in the fossil record, or with molecular studies showing how evolution occurs at a genetic level, they simple refuse to accept the evidence. Not only this, but creationists assume that if they cast doubt on evolution that they must be right by default. As though if I show that your football team is not the best it
Creation Science and the Theory of Evolution 2. In the twentieth century, many discoveries were made regarding the theory of evolution, more specifically about the evolution of the universe and life. These discoveries were thought to be opposite to what the Christian Bible teaches. However, many religious and scientific professionals wonder if their respective fields are as opposing as they previously supposed. 3. The Bible and the scientific discoveries regarding the theory of evolution are very…
Nikkita Bryant March 4 2013 Phase 2 Individual Project SCI 210-1301B-02 The Sciences: Inquiry, Innovation and Invention This two phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are very different. One of the differences between the models is the theorized rate for the evolution. In one of them the rate is very slow and considered to be constant for it a species, that model is the phyletic gradualism. They have experience a problem with this in the paleontology…
Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences ISBN: 0-309-53221-3, 150 pages, 8.5 x 11, (1998) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/5787.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books…
English 4 20 December 2012 “Creationism Does Not Belong In Science” "As soon you realize that one species could evolve into another, the whole structure…” (Darwin) of religion becomes dirt. Science class in school teaches you the science about how the world works; it introduces you to theories and facts that involve the science of the universe. In biology, one is taught the theory of evolution, the science of how we as humans became. Evolution is the foundation of modern biology teaching students how…
Cassidy Emmett Mrs. Warrem Bio 1 Period 2 Evolution Theory Charles Darwin is best known for his contributions to evolutionary theory. It was his theory that all species of life descended over time from common ancestors in a process that he called natural selection. He was an English naturalist and a geologist. He studied medicine and the University of Edinburgh. He also studied at the University of Cambridge which encouraged his passion for natural science as he helped to investigate marine invertebrates…
design: legitimate science? Federal court decides Oct. 2004 Dover, Penn. School board required high school science classed to tell students evolution not only option. Intelligent design as well. Organisms too complex to evolve through evolution alone. Some must be created by designer. Bold new scientific theory. Based on science, not religion, therefore should be discussed in class. opening path of inquiry, new ways to think. Critique of scientific doctrine of evolution is science as well. Gaps…
Evolution and Creationism In Public Education: An In-depth Reading Of Public Opinion Results Of A Comprehensive, National Survey Prepared For: People For the American Way Foundation www.pfaw.org Prepared By: DYG, Inc. March 2000 Table Of Contents Page Executive Summary...................................................................................3 Background And Objectives ......................................................................8 Methodology ..............................…
second way that humans could have originated is through a process called evolution. Evolution is a theory proposed by scientists to explain the origin of all species. Because both explanations are theories, neither can be proven right or wrong. To make a decision on which theory is…
disguised as science, and as such, should not be taught in our public schools. Introduction The town of Dover, PA looks like any other small towns in central Pennsylvania, but in October 2004 when the local school board proposed a slight alteration to the high school biology curriculum a fault line erupted between those who think of intelligent design as science and something that should be taught alongside evolution, and those…
Evolution By Natural Selection Is Wrong!! All living things face many questions throughout their life such as what am I and what is the purpose on earth? Over the past centuries, science have been investigating these questions. At the same time, many cultures around the world have answers to these questions as well. According to science, these answers are concerned as myths or made up stories. Cultures all over the world believe “GOD” or “An Intelligent Designer” made all the living things. Modern…