Defending Slavery The purpose of this paper is to discuss the issue of African slavery in America in the antebellum by late eighteenth century and before the antebellum crisis as discussed in Paul Finkelman’s book: Defending Slavery. This paper will summarize the first part of book taking as a main topic racial aspects of the slavery. After the introductory summary , this paper will focus in two specific sections found in the second part of the book: “Religion and Slavery” and “Racial Theory and Slavery”. Lastly, this paper will analyze these two themes used as a justification of African Slavery in early history of America In his book “Defending Slavery”, Finkelman presents a collection of historical documents Critical Analysis
In Paul Finkelman’s book, particularly the fragments dedicated at the defense of slavery based on racial and religious justification state that black people where created by God and placed in Africa with the unique purpose to be servant of white people. This statement was scientifically dismantled by the Charles Darwin’s Theory of Universal Common Descent published in 1889. This theory is based on reliable scientific observations, asserts that “all living organisms currently present on Earth share a common genetic ancestor with each being the descendant from a single original species.” During more than one hundred and fifty years after Darwin presented this theory, numerous researchers have proven that Darwin’s assertions were correct. In 1851, Samuel Cartwright, a well known New Orleans physician for dedicated his medical practice treating slaves and specialized on what they called “negro diseases” wrote a report to the Medical Association of Louisiana called: “The diseases and physical peculiarities of Negro race” . Cartwright’s report described about anthropology and origin of the races providing a biblical interpretation. This paper was clearly based on mere physical observations made on his medical practice rather than scientific evidence. The information about
A Mother’s Love Historically there are social facts against humanity that most humans do not stop to analyze or simply document. The issue of slavery has been a controversial fact that even in the XXI century it is still recognized as inhumane and repugnant. The days of slavery dates back to a time when African American blacks were treated as waste than gifted individuals with some time to offer the American society. History has valuably cases of slaves who fought for a better future, for freedom…
Slavery in the United States existed from the early years of the colonial period; it was firmly established by the time the United States sought independence from Great Britain in 1776. However, by 1804, all states north of the Mason and Dixon Line had either abolished slavery outright or passed laws for the gradual abolition of slavery. In 1787 Congress prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territory. But slavery gained new life in the South with the cotton industry after 1800, and expanded into the…
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. Democratic Party: The major political party in America most sympathetic to states rights and willing to tolerate the spread of slavery to the territories. Democrats opposed a strong Federal government. Most Southern men were Democrats before the War. Emancipation: Freedom from slavery. See Emancipation Proclamation » Flying Battery: A system where several horse-drawn cannons would ride along the battle front, stop and set up the guns, fire, limber up…
interpreted under these assumptions, seemed to clearly suggest that slavery was Biblically justified. Modern historians differ somewhat on the relationship between religion and southern sectionalism, however. Christine Leigh Heyrman, in Southern Cross: The Beginnings of the Bible Belt (1997), utilizing journals of late 18th and early 19th century Baptist and Methodist ministers, concludes that religious leaders accommodated slavery in order to gain ground in the South. Even if looked at through the…
Secondly, the slaves in Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglas wanted more freedom then just able to survive. In the colonial time in late 1800’s slavery started in southern and some in northern. Slaves were forced to work under a white person. They didn’t have independent. They were punished for not following the rules. Freedom and survival from the slavery ware their biggest concern. The main character Douglas proved his manhood by getting the freedom. Although it wasn’t easy for him to become free…
country called Mexico. America should not have declared war on Mexico because it was an unnecessary, aggressive act to gain territory, the fact that Mexicans did not attack on American soil, and some Americans were against it because of the issue of slavery. The first reason America should not have declared war on Mexico is because it was unnecessary and aggressive. James K. Polk’s only reason to attack Mexico was to fulfill his wishes to extend America to make it a two ocean country. Many people who…
In the 1860 presidential election, Republicans, led by Abraham Lincoln, opposed the expansion of slavery into United States' territories. Lincoln won, but before his inauguration on March 4, 1861, seven slave states with cotton-based economies formed the Confederacy. Outgoing Democratic President James Buchanan and the incoming Republicans rejected secession as illegal. Lincoln's inaugural address declared his administration would not initiate civil war. Eight remaining slave states continued to…
like any other servant for the people to come and send him on any errand they wish.” These people would soon realize how much they underestimated Lincoln. On the surface, Lincoln appeared to be a man of contradiction. For example, he was against slavery, but was hesitant to free slaves. He was a loyal supporter of the Constitution, yet he suspended the habeas corpus. These contradictions are part of Lincoln’s personality. He maintained high ideals yet kept practical goals. For instance, when there…
Brian Jarquin Ms. Montooth AP Language, Period 5 4 February 2013 Why the Troops don’t Protect Our Freedoms Protecting a countries freedom has always been the reason or excuse of why we go to war. I believe that war is not needed to acquire or protect a countries freedom. This may be because of all the hardships war brings to a country while it’s in war and after the war is over. These people say that we need to go to war because we have to show the rest of the world that we will not stand by…
and save face over any realistic and practical expectations regarding the extension of slavery, into the territories that were conquered or usurped or politically acquired. Holt also holds another argument strongly that has been criticized from time to time and that is that it wasn’t slavery per-say but the continuous debates and differences in opinion and stances on topics related to the extension of slavery into the new territories and states that resulted into the great divide between the North…