Critically appraise an aspect of your assessment practice that has developed during this module, explaining how your professional knowledge has grown.
Introduction
This essay will reflect on the core initial assessment process of the patient in the Accident & Emergency (A&E) department where I am employed as a staff nurse. The Gibbs model of reflection is used in a rudimentary way to form the structure as it a model I have used previously and is the one with which I am most familiar.
I will explore how the initial nursing assessment is undertaken and compare it to other processes employed by other A&E departments and I aim to highlight strengths or weaknesses and look at the background history and evidence base for why we do the assessment the way that we do.
The reason for doing so is to inform a core duty and process that I undertake with knowledge and solid reasoning, the aim being to improve my skill and expertise to perform the assessment process.
Any names and identifying data have been changed to protect confidentiality in accordance with the Nursing and Midwifery (NMC) Code of Practice (2008).
Initial Assessment
My role within the A&E department is that of registered staff nurse. The Collins English Dictionary (2009) defines a staff nurse as; “A person who works in a hospital taking care of the ill and injured and whose rank is below that of a sister”.
I work in all areas of the A&E department including Minors, Majors, Paediatrics and the rests room. It is my duty to perform many clinical tasks including; recording vital observations, the preparing and administering of medicines as well as other clinical tests and investigations.
One of the main tasks that I and all other qualified nurses undertake regardless of which area in A&E that they are working in is the initial assessment of patient. This is referred to by most staff as triage. Fitzgerald et al (2010) defines Triage is ‘an essential element of modern medical care as it is necessary to assign relatively scarce resources to unlimited medical needs’.
This refers to nursing or hospital based triage (Williams, 1992) as opposed to the many forms of battlefield triage or emergency triage as employed in times of disaster or mass casualty incidents. (Collins 2009, Iserson & Moskop 2007)
The Mosby's Medical Dictionary (2009) defines a clinical assessment as "an evaluation of a patient's physical condition and prognosis based on information gathered from physical and laboratory examinations and the patient's medical history."
Although accurate, this definition alludes to reaching a complete prognosis with returned laboratory results. The initial assessment performed in the department where I work is in most cases considered complete long before a prognosis is made and results have been returned.
The Initial assessment as it is called on the Casualty Cards used in A&E therefore is just the start of the A&E process and not the end. However, there are occasions where a prognosis, diagnosis, treatment and discharge could conceivably happen within minutes of a patient’s presentation. (See &Treat)
Yet, despite the first page of the Casualty Card (cascard) being titled as ‘Initial Assessment’ I would argue that the real initial assessment has actually been performed by the A&E reception staff. It is they who decided whether to send the patient to minors, paediatrics, majors or resus.
These areas automatically infer an urgency to treat and so a patient who is sent to majors would most likely been seen more urgently than a patient sent to minors. This system employed by the reception staff does more resemble the battlefield triage systems employed across the world, as it is a crude and quick process.
Prior to undertaking the A&E course and this assignment I had always considered this to be a risky process that was both potentially unsafe for the patient and an unfair burden on the receptionist. However there is some
Related Documents: Critical appraisal of an assessment practice. Essay
areas according to a numbered scale. A disadvantage of this type appraisal system is subject to the interpretation and judgment of the evaluator. The Narrative Technique utilizes a written essay detailing the employee’s job performance. This technique requires the evaluator to write an individual essay for all employees. This can be simplified some by creating a plan for each employee prior to the actual time of appraisal. The Critical Incident Review Method involves actively watching and recording…
Nursing Practice Review Mentoring Keywords: Mentoring/Continuing professional development/Portfolio ●This article has been double-blind peer reviewed CPD for mentors: creating a portfolio Mentors can use a portfolio of evidence to show continuing professional development In this article... Why mentors need a CPD portfolio How to create a portfolio of evidence Using a SWOT analysis to identify strengths and weaknesses Author Louise Lawson is senior lecturer, School of Nursing…
The main role of appraisals is to maintain organizational performance, as well as the individual performance in order to identify the main issue within the organization. CIPD research (2009) showed that more than 80% of HR practitioners carry out performance appraisal which indicates that half of those people are actually satisfied with the results. Redman & Wilkinson (2009) specified that it’s not recently that studies have explicitly focused on performance issues and the data has been available…
Performance Appraisal by Shilpi Singhvi HRM 6020 CRN 20309 – Strategic Recruiting, Training & Performance Management Date : 11th Feb 2013 Abstract Performance appraisal is a strategic approach through disciplinary documentations to put all the employees on the same page and manage their performance. In the outset of a given period; manager with his employees set specific, measurable, quantifiable goals, which are evaluated through out the year under coaching, guidance and support…
Tool or annual appraisal. Reviews of employee performance should be conducted routinely throughout the year, but should occur no less than annually. Additionally, when an employee demonstrates a specific period of unusual performance, either complimentary or critical, a review of this performance should be documented. This paper discusses various forms of performance appraisals and performance measurement errors. Employee Performance Assessment and Common Errors in Making Assessments Employee…
Title: The Role of ES Review Submission Date: November 9, 2013 University ID Number: 9297731 Word Count: 1548 1. Introduction Environmental Impact Assessment as a tool for decision making has been formally initiated in late sixty‟s at USA through National Environmental Protection Act, 1969 (Glasson et al., 2012, p.50) which has been now adopted by majority of countries of the world (Sadler, 1996, p.25; Petts, 2009; NCEA, 2013). To monitor the quality of Environmental Statements…
research question. The main features will focus on the reliability and validity of the chosen topic of the Waterlow Scale tool and the comprehensive evaluation of the evidence. The main aim of this report is to validate the effectiveness of Waterlow Assessment Tool and identify any risk factors, towards the prevention of pressure ulcers. The overall strengths and weaknesses of the report will highlight any…
organization. Keep performance indicator:- According to the operational plan we should be check all staff performance many things are measurable. That does not make them key to the organization's success. In selecting Key Performance Indicators, it is critical to limit them to those factors that are essential to the organization reaching its goals. It is also important to keep the number of Key Performance Indicators small just to keep everyone's attention focused on achieving the same KPI we should be…
Understanding Performance Management The mandate to operate at an optimal performance level and meet financial and organizational expectations are transforming the way organizations do business. This evolution is driving higher standards of competence in day-to-day operations and adding new pressure to increase stakeholder value. In today’s rapid-paced business climate, the agility with which a company manages performance can determine market position and company profitability. Defining Performance…
A Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal Georgetown University Research Methods and Biostatistics for Health Care Providers NURO 530 Dr. Maureen McLaughlin September 26, 2013 A Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal This paper is a quantitative research critical appraisal on the research study titled “Improving Hospice Outcomes Through Systematic Assessment”. The authors of the study are Susan C. McMillan, PhD, ARNP, FAAN, Brent J. Small, PhD, and William E. Haley PhD. The study was…