There are many components that make up the judicial process. If someone wanted to know the key parts of the judicial process I would start by telling them the types of laws and what they mean. When it comes to laws there is common law and there is statutory laws are the types of laws that are applied here in our judicial system. The next component of our judicial process is the staffing of the courts, which can be made for the highest position by election or the appointive method where he or she is appointed by a government official.
At the forefront of the Judicial process knows the distinction between federal courts and state court, and the branches that are within both. In the state court there is the Justice of the peace, the Municipal Court, The County Court, The Intermediate Court of Appeal, and the State Supreme Court. Each of these courts plays a very integral part when it comes to the state court systems. The various branches within the federal court system are The Federal Legislative Court, the Ex-legislative special Consuitiional Court and of course the United States Supreme Court. Of all of the above mentioned components of the judicial process there is not one more important than the other, because they are all applied to different laws and statues respectively according to true merit with this type of judicial system we are always left with the question is our process fair?
I believe while our judicial system may not be always perfect it is fair to all individuals who have to come before it in any capacity; whereas in other countries like Great Brittan or Wales where there judicial hierarchy is much more complex, you might not find their systems or polices as fortunate as ours in the United States. For example, in Wales their magistrate must stay 15 miles from the courthouse and they are unpaid volunteers who may or may not have any legal background, so when it comes to getting justice or injustice for a defendant you might have the feeling how can I get justice from someone who barely knows the law and they are unpaid so how happy can they be, but they are in a position of power to pass judgment on you. It is hard to imagine, but that is how their judicial process over in Great Brittan and Wales and other countries over abroad as well.
Laws
The types of laws can be traced back hundreds of years, what started as primitive law evolved into archaic law which turned into what we know today as mature law. The origins of the earlier laws can be traced back to Oceanic tribes and African tribes. Primitive law is based on primitive custom and may lack the basic machinery and organization. It is still prevalent in Oceanic and Asiatic tribes, it has been the law of these preliterate peoples who have recognized social roles, and have discovered means of coping with social conflict. Archaic law features some official manner of courts and institutions that are basic to any legal system, and they also introduce certain codes of procedure and substance and these applications of the law came about in the early days of Rome. As for the type of laws that are used here in the United States and that is mature law and these types of laws can be traced back to Rome in the 3rd Century and England in the 12th Century. All of these laws can be considered prongs of positive law, which is derived from man the purpose of ruling man, it is a command based on the relationship between ruler and being ruled; its primary nature is that it is manmade. Common law is commonly known as English, Anglo- Saxon or Anglo American law. It is a vast complex instrument of justice. Common law is judge made bench made law rather than a fixed body of definite rules, such as the modern civil law codes. The concept of the state as the highest form of society began to be questioned by the christen church. The term Common law was used for the laws
Related Documents: Essay on Courts: Jury and United States
DUNCAN V. LOUISIANA SUPERME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 391 U.S. 145 May 20, 1968, Decided FACTS. On October 18, 1966, the appellant, Gary Duncan, was driving on Highway 23 in Plaquemines Parish when he saw his two younger African-American cousins were talking with four white boys on the side of the road. The Appellant knew his cousins had recently transferred to a school which had been reported the encouraged his cousins to break off the encounter and enter his car, and the Appellant was about to…
LEGAL SYSTEM 2 A court or judicial system is a system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state and provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. The United States Court System is many court systems in one: federal and one court system for every state. Every system has its own structures and procedures. Most legal cases begin in a lower court, like a state court. Sometimes, cases work its way up to higher court, like the Supreme Court. But how does the judicial…
Internationals view on Courts describes public prosecution v. private prosecution. Private prosecution is the oldest and is usually initiated by the victim or victim’s family. Private prosecution is now mostly civil in nature for example slander or libel. In Ohio, cities solicitor either elected or appointed, other counties have a prosecuting attorney elected by the federal government and they also have United States prosecutors designated by regions of United States or appointed by the United States attorney…
Federal vs. State Courts Natalie D. CJ230: Criminal Law for Criminal Justice How a society punishes their criminals can say a lot about the way the citizens live their lives. Here in the United States we would rather take better care of someone in prison for life than a person on the street who has never committed a crime in their life. The U.S. Constitution creates a dual federal court system in which the power is shared between the state and the federal governments.…
Criminal case Jury or judge has to find the person guilty of the crime and that the jury has no reasonable doubt the defendant is guilty Doesn’t have to have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt If one person in a jury thinks person is innocent they cannot convict him System is to make sure somebody is guilty If there is doubt you cannot convict Reasonable doubt – if theres one person Civil trial two standards Preponderance of the evidence – the party with the burden of proof must convince the jury that the…
American Government The Fourth Amendmet March 21, 2011 Amendment Number IV Amendment number IV was added to Constitution of the United States on December 15, 1791. This amendment gives the people of the United States protection from government agencies and other agencies from entering or searching their homes, and their own private property without a search warrant. Search warrants are obtained by a government official, in most cases a detective…
phase of the criminal process is the Initial appearance. The initial appearance is where the accused is told of the charges advised of rights, bail is set, and a date for the preliminary hearing is set (Neubauer, 2014). This usually occurs in lower courts where many misdemeanor defendants plead guilty. The fourth phase of the criminal process is charging. Recognizing criminal charges against the defendant occurs during this stage, stating which criminal law was violated. Also during this stage Information…
UNITED STATES DEATH PENALTY Donald McCrimmon PHI 103 Instructor: Robert Gala February 17, 2013 United States Death Penalty [Whether] it be juveniles or a child, someone on medication or plain accidental death, must be taken in consideration when the death penalty is imposed. This has been a great debate for several years, and no pertinent answers have been agreed upon as yet. Taking the life of a human being, whether via lethal injection, or the electric chair, is something that needs addressing…
lasting impression. Observing a district and circuit court proceeding as well as digging deep into a case has broadened my once limited scope. There are so many layers to this constitutional right that we are all privileged to have as citizens of the United States I entered the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231 West Lafayette Blvd. in Detroit, Michigan to observe a federal corruption case in the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. I wanted to…
The Sixth Amendment of the constitution of the United States and is a portion of the Bill of Rights and concerns the rights that the prosecution enjoys in case of criminal trials and Harr states “it is there to achieve fair criminal prosecution” Harr, 2002, p.320). There are various rights that are allotted to the prosecution under this Amendment and there are certain limitations associated with the level at which these rights can be enjoyed. Under the Sixth Amendment a defendant who has been charged…