How well did the interactants succed in common goals

Leah- Rolled eyes unsure what to talk about non verbal
Tom- Rolled eyes unsure what to talk about Non verbal
Bashar- Spoke about getting people to use condoms. Thought it was lame
Corlynne- Quickley took notes, smiled knowing that they knew what they were going to discuss
Travis- Quickley took notes, smiled knowing that they knew what they were going to discuss
Louis- Nervous, didn’t have anything to say
Alicia- Tried to piggy back off of someone elses writings
Hallmein- nervous since ESL is second language
Julie- spoke for animal rights. Agreed testing was harmful but felt that activists went overboard. Mom had blood thrown on her for wearing a fur coat.
Bud- Gun control said criminals will get guns no matter what. Cited constitution
Naro- Uncomfortable with condom speech due to culture. In Japan not considered manly
Gretchen- Did not want to criticize Bashar but didn’t like the term lame. Brother lost part of his leg so it offends him. Wants more sensitivity to language
Brad- Agreed with Gretchen also threw in “guys” and “girls”
Leticia- asked Naro if he would ever wear a condom but got cut off by professor.
Kate- Liked that speakers weren’t afraid to take and admired willingness to take a position even if it didn’t match hers.
______________________________________________________________________________
Leah and Tom were unable to find a topic to discuss. This could be from the unwillingness to offend someone, the fear of public speaking, or just no real stance on an issue. Used nonverbal communications of rolling eyes
Bashar talked openly about a topic that most