Intro to marriage and family
SOC-C110-003
23 September 2013
Cohabitation influences relationships
Cohabiting couples can be relatively common in most therapy practices, since the rates of cohabitation have risen substantially over the years. It is estimated that approximately 50-60% of couples live together before getting married (Bumpass & Lu, 2000; Stanley, Whitton, &
Markman, 2004). Some may assume that these couples should be treated the same as married couples because there issues are the same. However, the reality is that cohabitating couples have unique issues and considerations that should be taken into account. Research has consistently found that couples who cohabitate prior to marriage are at greater risk for divorce and poor relationship quality, suggesting there are some risk factors inherent in these relationships
(Stanley, Rhoades, & Markman, 2006). Current literature identifies some key characteristics and risk factors associated with cohabitating couples which will be reviewed, providing insight for practical clinical considerations.
While all couples will be unique in a multitude of ways, cohabitating couples may share some common characteristics. A national study by the National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development found most cohabitating couples came from lower SES, lower levels of education, and non-White race/ethnicity. They generally are found to have greater ambivalence about their relationship and higher rates of relationship conflict, especially when children are involved (Klausli & Owen,
2009). Hsueh, Morrison, and Dorris, (2009) found the top five problem areas for couples to be 1) current relationship concerns (i.e., stress, unmet needs, conflict), 2) individual problems (i.e., personality, mood, health problems, psychological problems), 3) communication concerns, 4) arguments, and 5) emotional affection or distance.
Cohabitating couples have similar relationships to dating couples, especially in terms of problem frequency; however, they actually have been found to have more arguments than dating couples. Compared to married couples, cohabitating couples report having more vibrant, but more volatile relationships. In other words, they have more affective and dynamic relationships, which can often lead to greater reactivity and arguments (Hsueh, Morrison, and Dorris).
Couples‟ reasoning for cohabiting can greatly influence the “tone” of their relationship and commitment level. Some couples cohabitate for relationship reasons (i.e., spend more time together, wanting to spend life together) and others live together for more external reasons (i.e., finances, pregnancy, convenience; Surra & Hughes, 1997). This can impact their level and type of commitment. Rhoades, Stanley and Markman (2009) suggest that those who live together for relationship reasons are likely to have more of a dedication type of commitment. In other words, their level of commitment stems from their dedication to the relationship and their desire to remain in it. However, those who cohabitate for external reasons are thought to have more of a constraint type of commitment, or their commitment stems from the external constraints that keep them from leaving, not their desire to stay in the relationship
According to Rhoades, Stanley, and Markman (2009), most couples report spending more time together and convenience as their primary reasons for cohabitating, which could have various types of impact on their commitment according to the rational just discussed. Many couples choose to live together to “test” out their relationship, to determine if they want to continue in it or not. While this may sound like a good idea in theory, it can actually have a negative impact on their relationship. Those who use this type of reasoning are found to have more negative communication, higher levels of physical aggression, poorer
your marriage can remain attached. who needs marriage? 40% Of Americans believe that marriage is obsolete (outdated, (inappropriate to the circumstances), if the marriages are obsolete then healthy societies soon be obsolete. Divorce and unmarried parents maternity / os costs them to payers of taxes $112 billion a year, and considerably increases the poverty level in the mothers as children, married mothers have lower levels of depression than single mothers or who cohabit. The social cost is huge…
Does Cohabitation Amounts to Marriage? It is true that the changes of cultural and social forces have made marriage less important to American family lives. Earlier women tended to leave home at the age of 20 or 21 to marry men who were also in their early twenties (Qu and Suriano 15). During that time unmarried women were seen as “frustrated spinsters”. The term spinster is rarely used nowadays, and the age of marriage and people’s attitude towards marriage and family has changed. In fact, family…
Emerging Adulthood (18-25) Characteristics include: Optimal time for physical work and childbearing Living on edge; extreme sports as there is a greater willingness to take risks Integrated vs complex: Self descriptions Complex: valuing openness and independence above all Integrated: able to regulate emotions and logic Anxiety disorders Anxious about themselves, relationships, future Age and genetic vulnerability shape the symptoms of anxiety disorders Cultural context OCD: Obsessive-Compulsive…
and a couple of children. Social policies such as marriage, divorce, welfare, domestic violence and children abuse have affected the family. Social policies are changing all the time due to views and laws changing. The legalisation of same sex marriages and contraception has had a great effect on the growth of family diversity. Contraception has allowed couples to control the amount of children they want, therefore the number of cohabiting couples have increased by 2% and sex before marriage has…
November 2013 What is the family? A family is a care-giving unit that can be made up of several variations of people from married couples, parents and children and adopted families. Not all families have to be related by blood and can be a family just by marriage or adoption. A household can still be a family but this can also be an individual, or a group of unrelated people that share income to cover all household bills. The family can be very…
Infatuation Present X X Affectionate Love X Present Present Fatuous Love Present X Present Consummate Love Present Present Present Infatuation – “An affair of a fling in which there is little intimacy and even less commitment.” Affectionate Love – “couples who have been married for many years Fatuous Love – “when one person worships another from a distance” Consummate love – “strongest, fullest form of love” Changes in Emotion in Late Adulthood Older adults reported experiencing more positive emotion…
According to the US Census Bureau, 36.3% of children are living absent of their biological fathers. Beginning in 1960 with 8% of children living without their biological father, that percentage has continued to increase. The issue of absent fathers has raised many questions as to what effects this has on individuals and society. Absent fathers (a term that can consist of many different things) can have a profound effect on the development of their daughter's relationships, especially when it comes…
To see how this transformed the belief that man was superior to animal, we will look at nineteenth-century novels like Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and some of Darwin himself. Finally, we shall read novels and films that suggest that man must cohabit this planet with other animals. Novellas like Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis and J.M. Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals, and films like the recent adaptation of The Life of Pi, bring us face to face with the ethical problems involved in living together…