Case Citation: Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)
Parties: Robert Anthony Williams / Appellant Crispus Nix, Warden of the Iowa State Penitently / Appellee
Facts: On December 26, 1968, Robert A. Williams was arrested for murdering a 10 year old girl in Des Moines Iowa on December24, 1968. The Body was found in a ditch besides a gravel road in Polk County. When Williams was arrested, investigators agreed with the awaiting counsel that he would not interrogate William during the ride to the police station, but the investigator improperly questioned Williams leading the investigator to the site of where the body was found.
Procedural History: During the first trial Williams was found Guilty of first degree murder. Since Williams was illegally interrogated on the way to police station and led the officer to the location of the body, the rights of Williams were violated. The motion to suppress evidence obtained from the statements was denied. In the second trial the statements made by Williams were not included and was again found guilty of first degree murder. Williams then continued to appeal because of the violation of his rights in the Sixth Amendment. He claims the evidence used from the body was illegally obtained through his statements and should’ve be suppressed.
Issue: Even though the court did not allow the self incriminating statements from Williams in the second trial, the evidence such as the condition of the body and autopsy results was evidence admitted through illegal interrogation due to police unlawful conduct. The interrogating of Williams violated his right to counsel as stated in the Sixth Amendment, which he did not waive.
Holding: The United States Supreme Court held the previous decisions made from the lower courts because the evidence would’ve been inevitably found by lawful means from the search party and that the police did not act in bad faith.
Reasoning:
1. Motion to suppress evidence was denied in first trial.
The court held the evidence was “fruit” of the case. The jury found Williams guilty of first degree murder.
2. Habeas corpus to the United States District Court for the southern District of Iowa
Agreed that the evidence had been wrongly admitted such as the statements made while under the custody of Detective Leaming and were not admissible in the second trial. However, the body and condition were sustained in the second trial since it would’ve
Eddie, Good effort on your Case Brief paper. However, you did not provide the necessary sub-headings for your Case Brief, and this is a serious omission. Furthermore, you needed to include more information under each sub-heading, if you had any. Please always type your names, course number and title, date, and perhaps Instructor's names on top of your papers. Your grade on this assignment is 82% (B-). Dr. Dennis A. Ogirri Washington et al. v. Harold Glucksberg et al. NO. 97-954 State of Iowa, Appellate…
Case Brief Randi HeimanConstitutional Criminal Procedures 09/10/2014 Title: Coolidge v. New Hampshire Citation: 403 US 433 (1970) Facts: In the case of Coolidge v. New Hampshire, the warrant issued to search the defendant’s automobile did not satisfy the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. The reason for this is because the warrant was not issued or approved by a “neutral and detached magistrate.” The constitutional rule states that searches conducted outside the judicial process without…
CASE BRIEF Case: State of Missouri v. David R. Bullock, 03CR679889.MO, [www.courts.mo.gov/casenet] Facts: At the time of the filing of his appeal, Mr. David R. Bullock had been charged and convicted of attempted statutory rape (under RSMO 566.032 and 564.011) and attempted sexual exploitation of a minor (under RSMO 564.011 and RSMO 566.032). David R. Bullock engaged in several conversations via email and chat rooms with a Newton County Deputy Sheriff who was conducting a sting operation…
DUNCAN BLOOM, Petitioner V. STATE OF WISOTA, Respondent RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS BRIEF AND CHIEF On Appeal from the State of Wisota Court of Appeals ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED AMBROSIO E. CASTELLANO ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 114 SERAFINA, NM 87701 (505) 470-7260 CONSEL FOR THE RESPODENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………………….. 3 I. Nature of the Case and Course Proceeding………………………………. 4 II. Summary of the Facts……………………………………………………. 5 III…
Board, which formerly employed Appellee as a prison corrections officer when it operated and managed the Prison, lose its immunity from suit under the Workers’ Compensation Act when it contracted with Wackenhut to operate and manage the Prison? Brief Answer Yes. We hold that the Board did lose its immunity from suit when it contracted with Wackenhut to operate and manage the prison and, accordingly, affirm the Commonwealth Court. Reasoning Wackenhut has the authority to hire, fire…
Criminal Justice I. Brief Cupp v. Murphy 412 U.S. 291, 93 S.Ct. 2000, 36 L.Ed.2d 900 (1973) Merits: The respondent, Daniel Murphy, was convicted by a jury in an Oregon court of the second-degree murder of his wife. The victim died by strangulation in her home in the city of Portland, and abrasions and lacerations were found on her throat. There was no sign of a break-in or robbery. Word of the murder was sent to the estranged husband…
Eyiesha SIngleton Style of Case and Citation: Young v. Becker & Poliakoff 88 So.3d 1002 (2012) Court Rendering Final Decision: Supreme Court of the United States ?????? Identification of Parties and Procedural Details: Who is the Plaintiff/Appellant? Who is the Defendant/Appealer? What is the cause of action? Who prevailed in lower court? Who is appealing to what court? Jacquelyn Young hired the law firm of Becker & Poliakoff to represent her in her federal employment discrimination…
CASE ANALYSIS GAINESBORO MACHINE TOOLS CORPORATION Main Issue Ashley Swenson, CFO of Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation (GMT), had to recommend an effective dividend policy at a down time of GMT stock price’s performance. She needed either to recommend to payout cash dividend or to buyback shares from its shareholders. Also, if any, the percentage of dividend payout has to be determined. Opinions about those recommendations were separated among board members and managers. At that time, a payout…
kaplan university- pa401 advanced legal writing | Case Brief Draft | Unit 3 Assignment | | Vicky Hunter | 1/21/2013 | | memorandum to: victoria corbo, esq. from: vICKY hUNTER- pARALEGAL Subject: Case Brief date: 3/2/2013 ------------------------------------------------- CC: Tony T. Smith Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000) Procedural History: Plaintiff, Elian Gonzalez, a six year old minor, through his “next of friend”, Lazaro Gonzalez, filed an asylum…
Robert Korn 3.2.15 Lululemon Case Brief 1. a. Demographic Segment: The demographic segment is important to the sportswear industry due to different age groups, cultures, and genders demanding different types and price points for their apparel. This is positive for the industry, since businesses can sell to anyone with an active lifestyle. b. Global Segment: The largest companies in this industry have achieved their size due to their penetration of global markets on multiple continents, suggesting…