Benjamin Boyett
Professor Tyrrell
English 1302
12 February 2013
The Death of the Death Penalty
In the case of Furman vs. Georgia (408 U.S. 238), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that, under the current laws "the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty ... constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments" (Bedeau 2). The death penalty is an unconstitutional punishment and should not even be considered to be part of the United States’ justice system. Although the death penalty can bring closure to a few relatives of murder victims, the execution of those convicted of murder violates basic human rights, can come at the cost of incompetent lawyers and, in many cases, the lives of innocent people.
Capital punishment, better known as the death penalty, is one of the most controversial issues among American citizens today. This issue evokes, in each person, diverse and conflicting emotions on the subject. Although some states, such as Texas, are instilling almost a fast-lane to death row, much “momentum is moving against capital punishment” (Turow 1). Death sentences from juries have seemingly declined, and in four states – New Jersey, New Mexico, Illinois, and New York – lawmakers have outlawed the death penalty completely. Additionally, there are also quite a few organizations, such as Murder Victim’s Family’s for Human Rights (MVFHR) protesting against capital punishment and winning a lot of ground in the battle for abolition due to the cause they support (Cushing 1). The battle against the death penalty is being won by people like these while their cause is being aided by many lately made mistakes in the judiciary system. From 1973 until 2006, DNA testing advancements have exposed evidence which has proven many inmates innocent, resulting in the release of 177 death row inmates (Henningfeld 36). People have fought the death penalty with everything they have for a long time now, and, eventually, their persistence will pay off.
Many unwarranted convictions occur because of incompetent lawyers. The inability to acquire a sound and competent lawyer and deter faulty evidence by many of those accused of murder leads to many convictions and executions. The Chicago Tribune in Illinois, one of the states that has recently abolished the death penalty, discovered that over “300 capital [murder] cases” had “incompetent legal work,” and that many of these cases were commonly “riddled with bias and error” (Williams 45). The sheer magnitude of inept lawyers and judges makes it a known fact that the legal system has many flaws in it, and should not be relied on to decide whether or not someone is executed, and because more of this is being brought to light as in quite a few cases in Georgia, exposed by a local newspaper, where out of “159 ruling that upheld death sentences,” there were “24…[that had] ineffective defense lawyers” (Rankin, Vogell, Wertheim 5). Of these people being brought to death, over fifteen percent of those convicted of murder had lawyers that were not fit to defend them. And, in one of these cases, a man’s defense lawyer actually “slept through parts of the trial,” displaying how poor a lawyer that some of these “convicts” are stuck with to defend their lives (Rankin, Vogell, Wertheim 4). When someone, fighting to save another man’s life to provide evidence for his innocence, is just sleeping on the job, how could someone in their right minds possibly sentence said man to his death? The fact of the matter is, when there are so many people accused of crimes they possibly did not commit, yet they receive a conviction due to a terrible lawyer, they simply cannot be sentenced to death.
The execution of criminals is against human rights and is a violation of the sacred nature of life itself. A member of one of the biggest anti-death penalty organizations, the MVFHR, describes that the MVFHR “was founded…by a group of families and survivors of
Capital Punishment Capital punishment is a legal practice of issuing death as a penalty for committing the most terrible crimes, such as murder, rape and kidnapping. Another term for capital punishment is death penalty. Executions can be performed by lethal injection or gas, electrocution, hanging or by shooting. In the United States, 33 states currently have the death penalty, including the U.S. military. It would be good to think that the justice system is perfect but sadly there have been many…
Capital Punishment Capital punishment is and has been a major discussion point for many years and I personally believe it is time to bring it back. Not only will it lower the level of crime rates but it may also grant the victims’ families a bit of justice. Capital punishment should be brought back but only be used for the worst of crimes so it will only take place for the most heartless criminals. Although the death penalty may seem like a good option to put off crimes the statistics show otherwise…
When we hear the term capital punishment or the death penalty we often think of people being executed for the horrific crimes they committed. Justice is served. In ancient times any person could be sentenced to death for any charges brought about by their accusers. Often, many innocent people were condemned to die along with the guilty. Now that we are in the modern era, society has taken a different stance on capital punishment. Many countries have abolished the death penalty on the basis of…
Death Capital Punishment has always been a controversial topic in American history. From the Salem Witch Trials of burning individuals accused of practicing witchcraft, to lethal injections for persons found guilty of a heinous crime. These sentencing are based on the ancient quote/belief, “an eye for an eye” meaning if a person killed any other person then he should also be killed. Capital punishment was also established to detour criminal activity and to protect society. I believe that capital punishment…
Capital Punishment 3 United States government needs to go the opposite way because the United States government is in a lot of debt with other countries because of the wars. Many people can be wrongly accused of committing crimes and given capital punishment. “More then 170 people have been exonerated by DNA testing after being misidentified before conviction. In most murder cases there is no DNA present, only 10% of all murder cases there is DNA available (Cardozo).” If America doesn’t completely…
Capital punishment is a legal practice in which prisoners are executed as punishment by the state in accordance with judicial practice when they are convicted of committing a crime what is known as a “capital crime.” People may also use the term “death penalty” to refer to capital punishment. The judicial order that someone be punished in this procedure is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution .Worldwide, this practice is extremely controversial, with a…
Capital Punishment When it comes to capital punishment I am against it. I don’t believe that someone should be killed for committing a murder because that just makes us a killer as well. If I were for capital punishment I guess it would be a way to send a warning to future criminals. Although murder still happens, maybe the person committing the crime might think about the consequences and decided to let the victim free because in the back of their head they think about the capital punishment.…
After DNA testing, Damon was proved innocent (After fifteen years 1). Many innocent people wait years on death row much like Damon, but only some of them are proven innocent after it is already too late. Innocent lives have been lost due to capital punishment, which was first and foremost an exercise of state power that legitimated government authority and controlled crime; overall whose right is it to choose who lives and who dies? The death penalty was started to help control crime, protect…
Use of Capital Punishment Joshua Bolt ENG 147 May, 4 2015 Erin Nemiroff Use of Capital Punishment Capital punishment has been a subject of great debate for years within our country. Both sides of the fence feel very strongly when it comes to their opinions of capital punishment. This form of punishment has been around for years and is very unlikely to go away. There is no way you will be able to satisfy both sides of the fence because we do not live in a perfect world. However, there are a few reasons…
punishing a person who has committed a horrible crime? What is considered a horrible crime? In Canada we do not have capital punishment, the definition of capital punishment or the death penalty is when a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The execution can be by an electric chair or a lethal injection. One of the reasons I don’t think capital punishment is fair, is because in certain circumstances years later a person is found innocent. For example in 1959 there was…