Drug testing in the workplace is relevant and important in today's society. The issue of drug testing in the workplace has sparked an ongoing debate in businesses throughout the United States. There are many who feel that drug testing is essential in order to prevent risks of harm to the greater public caused by substance abuse while on the job. As more illegal drugs appear on the market, drug abuse also increases as well as drug addicts or even people who want to simply "try it out one time." This causes the questions to arise; should drug testing be required in professional sports, schools and in the workplace? Should employees be exempted from drug testing after getting the job? What method of drug testing is most efficient? While some people think that it is an invasion of privacy, I believe that it is necessary for the reputation of a business as well as the safety of other employees, and customers. Drug testing should be required in professional sports, schools, and in the workplace to help prevent drug use and in turn provide and protect a healthy future. According to whatisdrugtesting.com, a drug test is the examination of human tissue or fluid samples to determine the presence or absence of specified drugs or their metabolized traces. Drug testing helps employers determine whether a potential employee is fit for the job and its requirements, it also lessens time for interviewers as many people who know they will fail a drug test will simply leave before even being interviewed. In today’s society, drugs have become increasingly dangerous to a person’s physical and mental well being as well as to those surrounding them. During interviews for job placement, many businesses undergo drug testing procedures. These tests are to look for any illegal drug intake as well as abusive intake of a substance. Though drug testing may be a burden to small businesses because of its high cost, it is also a necessary expense to have whether in a new and upcoming or a well known reputable business place. Not only is it important to provide drug tests during the interviewing process, it is also just as imperative to provide routine drug tests for current employees. (Mybinc.com) states that, “It’s easy for employers to dismiss drug testing in the workplace – they might think it’s an unnecessary expense, or they’d “know” if their employees weren’t sober at work. But these days this is a naive outlook to have. The website also shows statistics to support this statement; more than six percent of the population over 12 years of age (13.9 million people) has used drugs within the past thirty days. Seventy-three percent of all current drug users aged 18 and older (8.3 million adults) are employed. This includes 6.7 million full-time workers and 1.6 million part-time workers. Along with substance abuse come the risks that they may cause. Employees who use illegal drugs are more likely to have accidents on the job because of this. “70% of substance misusers are working in full-time employment and are 3.6 times more likely to be involved in an accident in the workplace, 5 times more likely to file workers' compensation claims, and 33 percent less productive than than their substance-free colleagues.,” as
Workplace Drug Testing: A Boon or a Bane? Legal, Ethical, and HR and Concerns Workplace Drug Testing: A Boon or a Bane? Legal, Ethical, and HR and Concerns Both pre-employment and incumbent work place drug testing is a polarizing and controversial subject, a subject which elicits equally vehement sentiments, and lucid, persuasive, and cogent arguments from both those who are fully in favor of the practice and from those who are adamantly opposed to it. The Viet Nam War saw unprecedented use…
Composition April 24, 2013 Random Drug Testing in the Workplace As a former administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Peter B. Bensinger states that there are “22 million marijuana users, 4 million current abusers or cocaine, and over 10 million Americans using prescription drugs without an appropriate medical prescription or for nonmedical purposes…” which brings to light the problem the world is facing. Should your employers be allowed to have random drug tests for their employees? Reasons…
test for illegal drugs before receiving any type of assistant. I believe the governments should require mandatory drug testing for illegal drugs such as Cocaine, Marijuana, Heroin, PCPS, etc.., in order to receive assistants. If people have the money and can afford to buy illegal drugs then I think they can support themselves and their family. The governments will be saving money by testing for drugs before receiving benefits. A lot of time people won’t get a job because their drug test can back positive…
Abstract In this essay I have selected to answer and discuss case study choice two: The case for and against Drug Testing. The case study consists of heightened awareness of potential drug abuse and use amongst the companies employees violating the company policy. The company Castulon Corporation was in for a shock, when they found that some employees had used illicit drugs Faced with hazards of the safety integrity of the organization, employees and products. Personnel within the organization…
The actual vibrating display is actually popular within nearly every business within existence and when we have to procedure as well as produce items, all of us may have a tendency to find the vibrating display since the typical device. When it comes to drugs business, additionally, pozzolana cement production lineit performs an essential part past customers’ creativity. At the moment, you will find couple of equipment businesses which are able to perform investigation as well as improvement about…
Affirmative Debate Random Drug Tests Should Be Mandatory For The Safety Of Students With the legalization and the associated acceptance of marijuana, drug usage in high school students (Grades 812) is on the rise. My colleague and I agree that with the implementation of RSDTs (random student drug tests), a safer environment is created, students are more likely to succeed, and prevention will be effective within an educational setting. RSDTs are shown to lower the usage of illicit drugs in schools, ultimately keeping…
The Business of Developing New Drugs for Cancer Patients English 115 November 9, 2013 The Business of Developing New Drugs for Cancer Patients The author of this informative paper is a communication specialist writing about the Business of Developing New Drugs for cancer Patients. In this informative paper the author talks about four major issues: today’s economic situation, special needs (e.g., health) of the population being served, process, and benefits of the program. In…
Hasan Background of Case 6: CHADWICK, INC.: THE BALANCED SCORECARD (ABRIDGED) Chadwick. Inc was a diversified producer of personal consumer products and pharmaceuticals. The Norwalk Division of Chadwick developed, manufactured and sold ethical drugs. The company was respected for the high quality of its products. Norwalk sold its products through several key distributors who supplied local markets. Norwalk relied on its excellent relations with the distributors who promote Norwalk’s products to…
English IV Mrs. Hoffman January 21st, 2014 Drugs and Athletes Over time, athletes using drugs has became a big problem. "Just because you're tested doesn't mean your clean we know that" (Aschwanden). That is how its viewed today. If the rules were stricter, they would work better. We need to get a single organization for all sports and nations to get everyone on one page, and we also need to fix the drug testing and be more strict to eleminate the use of drugs by athletes. The original intent of anti-doping…
Drug testing for welfare recipients The state of Florida recently headed up a movement that was widespread among the United States highlighting a popular issue, drug testing welfare applicants. Florida proposed that the recipients pay for a drug test to continue to receive benefits and if found positive for drug use the recipient will become ineligible for a year. This movement has been a very politically controversial topic but yet is a hot topic in taxpayer’s minds. Some argue that it is not right…