Ban And Blyth Essay

Submitted By skydiamond5
Words: 7241
Pages: 29

This article was downloaded by: [Library Services City University London]
On: 22 January 2015, At: 02:05
Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK

Review of International Political
Economy
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrip20 The BRICs and the Washington
Consensus: An introduction a Cornel Ban & Mark Blyth a b

Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts , USA

b

Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , USA
Published online: 15 Apr 2013.

To cite this article: Cornel Ban & Mark Blyth (2013) The BRICs and the Washington
Consensus: An introduction, Review of International Political Economy, 20:2, 241-255,
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.779374

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sublicensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly

Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 02:05 22 January 2015

forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions Review of International Political Economy, 2013
Vol. 20, No. 2, 241–255, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.779374

Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 02:05 22 January 2015

The BRICs and the Washington Consensus:
An introduction
Cornel Ban1 and Mark Blyth2
1

Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

2

Over the past two decades, the spread of ideas and policies associated with the Washington Consensus has captured the attention of political economists. As a systemic feature of the global economy, this process of diffusion has merited such scholarly attention. However, the systemic shock of the Great Recession has called into question the oft-noted convergence of rising economic powers such as Brazil, Russia, India and China
(BRICs), along with their supposed relationship to the Washington Consensus policy paradigm. Indeed, the crisis has brought to the fore the question of whether the BRICs have ‘grown apart’ from both the ideas and the policies prepared for them by Washington-based institutions. To date, there has been no systematic scholarly effort aimed at analysing the spread of Washington Consensus ideas and policies in relation to the rise of the
BRICs.
This special issue attempts to fill this gap through six contributions that bring together scholars interested in the political economy of development and the sociology of ideational and institutional change. Their main finding is that the BRICs attempted to balance their adoption of select parts of the
Washington Consensus template while defending and often reinventing the relevance of state-led development policies under