Are the U.S. Television News Networks ethical in their political reporting?
Business Ethics
MANA-6320 N2

Submitted To
Dr. Sandi Reids
Submitted by
Dixitkumar Patel
Dallas Baptist University

I. Introduction
II. Pros of Media
A. Accurate in time, no issue of time lack
B. Highly interactive
C. It empower the voice of the individual
D. Unite people
III. Cons of Media
A. Shorten attention span
B. Anonymous
C. Discourage face to face interaction
D. Harmful information
IV. Changes in news media audiences
V. Convergence of media
VI. Business Values
VII. Conclusion

I. Introduction First come television. Then satellite. Soon online versions of newspapers. Before long online adaptations of daily papers increased the news media scene. In the blink of an eye an enormous number of bloggers, countless destinations, web broadcasts, and "podcasts" have been able to be standard. All make up the "body" of today's news media, and there is no obvious end to this multiplication. The key good implications are triple: extended competition has impacted the way of news reports, individuals when all is said in done has inspired its enthusiasm for straightforwardness, and the news world's understanding of copyright has halted to suffice.
Newsmakers face expanding rivalry to cover all the relevant stories and achieve sources before their rivals. CNN and site news have depended on one end to the other, 24 hour scope to guarantee that they can give the story to their peruses/viewers when it happens. The peril is that speed will beat precision, and writers will trade their moral intentions as reality checking truth-seekers for the love of breaking a story - any story. Truly when you question individuals you do create connections, and there is some weight not to smolder the individuals you appreciate and depend on, (David Brooks, NY Times, June 30,2010).
Nonetheless, an increment in rivalry likewise has headed a few news associations to separate themselves from less capable outlets by being more straightforward about how they do their work. Writers who need to separate their articles as truthful and extensive have started giving the community to their sources. Studies are outfitted with room for give and take, statements are upheld by supporting web connections, and obscurity allowed to sources is altogether clarified.
While several columnists turn to straightforwardness to legitimize the cases in their reports, others have turned to a fundamentally more careless sort of making, named news tossing of affirmation. Many websites and free e-zines, failing to offer an engrained feeling of obligation to reality or to peruses, have created a journalistic style of unverified assumption. Thoughts are accumulated and afterward restated, without respect to their inception or factuality.
The way that data can be so effortlessly gotten to and afterward redistributed on the web has fit yet an alternate pattern: scrutinizing the estimation of copyright. As indicated by Piers Fawkes, co-maker of PSFK, a shared pattern reporting site, copyright has lost its esteem. "A blogger's employment is to spread thoughts," declares Fawkes. “Blogging gives an unparalleled technique for passing those considerations on to others. The reason we form is not to control our considerations. We create to add our contemplations to the overall talk."
II. Positive effect

A. Accurate in time, no issue of time lack
Occasions or news that happens at a state of time are promptly distributed through new media, for example, in Twitter, Facebook or in YouTube. It is quick and simple to deliver news through new media as there is not altering methodology and the need to print them on papers.
B. Highly interactive
Dissimilar to customary media, new media is exceedingly intelligent as the correspondence is constantly two path; between the distributers and the groups of onlookers. Thus new media is fewer predispositions than conventional media and it is more viable to