Case Summary
Healthcare is a major topic in the media, and how it affecting people all over the country. The government has implemented laws and policies to ensure that individuals can receive the proper medical attention, and has made healthcare affordable for American that are not able to pay out of pocket for services provided. This action by the government has caused a surplus in patients seen by healthcare providers, which in return has increase the paperwork associated with business practices. As a result, providers are implementing systems such as Electronic Medical Records to ensure that patient records are accurate and accessible for multiple providers for proper diagnosis.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) systems are systems
Explain your answer
With advances in technology, organization must continually upgrade current systems to ensure that the system’s capabilities are functional. One of the most difficult stages in the implementing of EMR system is the sharing of information between different systems. One of the essential purposes of an EMR system is to collaborate and store patient information that can be accessed by multiple providers. Utilizing what is known as an electronic patient records system or (ERP) is an electronic structure for the maintenance of information about the health condition and the care received by someone all his/her life (Vilar & Boudoux, 2002) . Some institutions that implement systems using ERP could actually face problems due to HIPPA laws when making information available to other sources.
Being able to provide information nationally could cause major problems for organizations utilizing as well. Providers have issues with privacy with information be easily accessible. Protection of information is vital, and developer must be able to control access and information that is provided through EMR systems. Christa Teston in her article, Investigating usability and “meaningful use” of electronic medical records, “A wide-ranging survey of healthcare providers and patients resulted in negative attitudes from a rather substantial minority of participants