Essay about Affirmative Action & Admissions Policies
Submitted By lglyrics13
Words: 2094
Pages: 9
The Past, Present, & the Future: Affirmative Action and Admission Policies
Steve Robert
Dr. Skipworth
MPAC 7156
12/04/ 2012
Since its first use in President John F. Kennedy’s Executive Order 10925 in 1961, the phrase “Affirmative Action” has taken several different meanings, but its intentional purpose remains the same. The overall objectives of affirmative action policies are to combat inequality by promoting equal opportunity and ensure inclusions of minority groups in governmental and educational programs. However, implementing those objectives has proven to be both difficult and controversial. Opponents have questioned whether it is the government’s duty to interfere by means of affirmative action. In response, proponents remind us that the government actively supported slavery and discrimination against some groups in society, therefore has an obligation to rectify the social imbalance (Rabe 2001). Over the last few decades, race-conscious admissions policies in Higher Education have triggered a series of court cases questioning the purpose and legality of affirmative action. The purpose of this paper is to analyze some of the legal issues challenging affirmative action in school admissions policies, the courts’ positions and its past rulings, and the future of affirmative action in universities’ admissions policies.
Supporters like the NAACP argue that affirmative action is well needed corrective justice. On the other hand, there are those who argue, undoing one wrong with another only creates further injustice. According to Sowell (2005) affirmative action, is considered needed remedy to compensate for past oppression or exploitation by the ruling class of a culture and to deal with existing discrimination. This point of view is generally shared by the higher courts. Justice Brennan, along with Justices White, Marshall, and Blackmun agreed that universities' attempts to alleviate the effects of past societal discrimination was itself “sufficiently important to justify the use of race-conscious admissions programs where there is a sound basis for concluding that minority underrepresentation is substantial and chronic, and that the handicap of past discrimination is impeding access of minorities” (Bakke, 1978). However, it is necessary to note that several of the cases were initially ruled against affirmative action on the basis that a race-conscious admission policies could not be used for the purpose of remedying past discrimination, and/or that diversity is not a government’s compelling interest. This is an interesting tendency that is common among the lower courts. For example, delivering the opinion of the Fifth Circuit court in Hopwood v. Texas (1996), Jerry E. Smith writes
"The University of Texas School of Law may not use race as a factor in deciding which applicants to admit in order to achieve a diverse student body, to combat the perceived effects of a hostile environment at the law school, to alleviate the law school's poor reputation in the minority community, or to eliminate any present effects of past discrimination by actors other than the law school."
In higher learning institutions, supporters argue the overall benefits of having affirmative action outweighs the so called injustice that it creates. However, implementation of affirmative action policies is often very problematic due to its unconstitutional nature. Some argue that affirmative action defies the very principles for which it stands, as it is within itself a form of discrimination against unfavorable groups, violating protected rights of others, and fosters a non-competitive environment. (Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978)
The unconstitutional aspect of affirmative action is a constant debate, and is often challenged in the courts. Legislatures have attempted to deal with affirmative action and admissions policies through different means. Many states successfully banned affirmative action through
Related Documents: Essay about Affirmative Action & Admissions Policies
Affirmative Action Katie Narloch, Tyler Young, Josh Barr, Aaron Broadwater University of Wisconsin Whitewater Abstract The objective of this paper is to inform readers on the topic of Affirmative Action. This paper will explore the history, importance, supporters and critics, organizational roles, and connections of affirmative action. Affirmative action is a controversial and often poorly understood topic. Affirmative Action is a policy that emphasizes a particular attention on jobs and…
Affirmative Action's Intentions: Education and the Workplace Caitlin Campanella ENG102 February 26, 2014 Affirmative Action's Intentions: Education and the Workplace Does the idea of affirmative action do what it was intended to do or does it create even more inequalities in the workplace and education? Ever since the civil war of the 1800s and the civil rights movement of the 1960s in which minorities in America, majorly composed of blacks and women, were denied the opportunity to use public…
Affirmative Action An Affirmative Action is a policy or program that guarantees equal education and employment opportunities amongst all people. It was set in to plan to, over time, get rid of discrimination, which could be considered race, gender, and ethnical profiling. Affirmative Action programs take in account that in previous times many groups of many have been discriminated against, and this plan gives them their opportunities back. Fisher v. University of Texas is an United States Supreme…
court further argued that the amendment only forbid slavery imposition Niederle, M., Segal, C., & Vesterlund, L. (2013). How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Science, 59(1), 1-16. Question 2: What is Affirmative Action? According to Niederle, Segal & Vesterlund (2011), affirmative action is the effort taken by the government or any other organization to improve the conditions of women and people from minority groups through establishing…
words an affirmative action. Reverse discrimination is when a policy or object is favoring the treatment of minority racial students over the majority students through the affirmative action programs which will have an unpleasant effect on the majority students. The APPLE Act calls for an affirmative action admissions policy, which basically means that universities will need to factor in a potential student’s race or ethnicity. However, factoring in the race or ethnicity, the admissions policy will favor…
Ria Gupta Human Rights Affirmative Action Affirmative action is an unnecessary and harmful practice. Although its main intent is to be an acceptable form of compensation for historical disadvantage, minorities will benefit more from having an equal chance as the majority. If we break down the previous paragraph further, acceptable does not define as fair. Rather, it means effective, compensation is to make up for. Historical disadvantage…
Affirmative action is a policy or a program that seeks to redress past discrimination of minorities through active measures in order to ensure equal opportunity, as in education and employment. In other words, it is policy that was established to hopefully eliminate racial preference and equalize the United States. The fight against discrimination has been a long lasting one that started with the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson, which ended in the desegregation of all schools (Ficker). Affirmative action…
Letters from Russia) The debate on affirmative action in India is long and not always geared to the desired aim: creation of equality of opportunity. Just like Indian secularism, reservation system in India has always a different political aim to make the system more unequal than what it is. Indian secularism, rather than making the state independent of religion, is intended to provide special privileges to certain religious groups. Similarly Indian affirmative system is politically designed to provide…
Affirmative Action History and Current Trends of Affirmative Action in the Workplace Thema Willette PUAD 621 Professor Seeman May 8, 2012 Origins of Affirmative Action Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it unlawful for an employer "to fail or refuse to hire an individual because of that individual's race, color, sex... or national origin." Affirmative action went a step further to ensure that active…
abortions and its practices. City of Richmond v. Croson Invalidated Richmond, Virginia's local ordinance establishing a minority business set-aside program.The Court, for the first time, adopted the strict scrutiny standard of review in assessing affirmative action programs, demanding that such programs be supported by a "compelling government interest" and narrowly tailored to ensure the program fits that interest. While not rejecting all governmental race-conscious remedies, the Court set a very high…