The concept of Separation of Powers [1] is a model for the governance of democratic states. The three branches of the government- the legislative, the executive and the judiciary are the three distinct activities in every government through which the will of the people are expressed. The legislature makes laws, the executive enforces them and the judiciary applies them to the specific cases arising out of the breach of law. Thus, it has become a model for the governance of democratic States. This model is also known as Trias Politica, which in the non-political context means ‘separation of duties’ which, for example, includes the segregation of accounting and custodial functions.
The proponents of the separation of powers believe that it protects democracy and forestalls tyranny. Whereas, the others say that there occurs considerable overlap of powers in parliamentary democracies. If we toe the middle line, we can observe that the Doctrine of Separation of Powers is like any other system with both merits as well as demerits. Thus, across the world, there isn’t any democracy with absolute separation of powers or complete absence of it. “This doctrine (of separation of powers) has got not only relevance to the question of separation of judiciary from the legislature and the executive, it has got a vital bearing upon the whole question of federalism,” said Brajeshwar Prasad on May 30, 1949, participating in the Constituent Assembly's discussion. [2]
Lord Acton had once aptly stated, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [3] ” Separation of power is a way of restraining the amount of power in the hands of any group or faction, making its abuse more difficult. “The premise behind the separation of powers is that when a single person or group has a large amount of power, they can become dangerous to citizens. [4] ” Therefore, separation of powers limits the unlimited exercise of power by any branch of the government. This doctrine also helps in checking corruption and unlawful activities against the interests of the common man whom the government is supposed to serve. Each organ while performing its activities tends to interfere in the sphere of working of another functionary because a strict demarcation of functions is not possible when it comes to dealing with the general public. Thus, even when acting in ambit of their own power, overlapping functions tend to appear amongst these organs. Thus, each organ will impose ‘checks and balances’ on the other.
In India, a lot of the present debate on the separation of powers is due to the active steps that the judiciary is taking to redress the sufferings of the common man. But behind the present brouhaha over the issue of judicial activism, what is often lost sight of is the politics of a turf-war among members of a troika who are also partners in running the Indian state. Although the Constitution mandates the separation of the judiciary from the
Related Documents: Administrative Law Essay examples
the numerous the potential talking points of this topic. The first heading regards the actual purpose of administration law, this essay shall review how administrative law works, it will do this by evaluating one of the core values of administrative law; accountability. Then it shall move onto the model used in administrative law to enforce proper standards of administrative decision making, this is called judicial review and will be analysed throughout…
PART A: This problem is a straight forward problem in judicial review and prerogative remedies. Judicial review can be done through Prerogative orders. Judicial review refers to the Court’s review of a lower or administrative body’s factual or legal findings[1]. Prerogative remedies are remedies which if not always are designed from the first for the control of governmental duties and powers, have long been used for the purpose especially[2]. These remedies are such as certiorari, mandamus…
Joe Q. Public and Administrative Law Shannon M. Heffner LS500: Legal Method and Process Professor Nancy Patete June 12, 2012 Often times, insurance companies and state funded insurance providers deny individuals healthcare coverage on account of a preexisting medical condition they have. This practice was accepted as being justifiable and no one thought twice about it being prejudicial against individuals having medical problems. Some individuals, including Joe Q. Public, are only offered…
/Week 2 Homework – GM520. 1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? Submit a copy of the proposed regulation along with your responses to these five questions. The proposed regulation can be submitted as either a separate Word document (.doc) or Adobe file (.pdf). This means you will submit two attachments…
TUMAINI UNIVERSITY IRINGA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE FACULTY OF LAW RESEARCH PROPOSAL RESEARCHERS: ❑ JESCA KABISSA ❑ PETER R. THADEO SUPERVISOR: ❑ MISS. RUHUNDWA TOPIC: AN EXAMINATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF, AND THE THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN TANZANIA. CONTENT PAGE 1. Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------…
In a nutshell, administrative law is about challenging official power. Challenge can be by an individual, company or non-profit organisation. Primarily an area of public law that regulates the relationship between the executive government and those it governs. This is to make that administrative body acts within the law. End of the 19th Century Professor Dicey, an influential figure in English constitutional law, denied the very existence of a separate branch of administrative law. Claimed that administrators…
he should be cover, he must cover it. To understand Administrative Law, it is important to understand the difference between a statue and a regulation. A statute is an enactment of a legislative body (federal, state, county or city); generally referred to as a law. The federal statutes are contained in the United States Code, or U.S.C. A regulation can be issued by an agency or department, such as the Health and Human Services to carry out law intended by Congress. Federal regulations are compiled…
common law? U.S. legal system was formed under the laws of the Anglo-Saxon legal family, so the main source of law it is considered a legal precedent. Precedent called the court's decision in a particular case shall become effective source of law, which is receiving the ability to set, modify or revoke the legal norms. U.S. common law suggests the existence of a hierarchy of precedents on which decisions taken by higher courts is binding in cases before the lower courts. U.S. common law system is…
Agency Authorization of Deregulation Administrative Law November 29, 2013 Abstract The Constitution, Congress, and state legislatures establish administrative agencies. The courts have allowed Congress and other legislative bodies to make laws that delegate lawmaking authority to administrative agencies. In Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, the Court held for the first time that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) creates a rebuttable presumption in favor of…
Limitation of law a. The law does not and cannot codify all ethical requirements b. An action is legal does not make it ethical c. So many laws, can violate without knowing d. “Gray area” make it difficult to determine what is “foreseeable”,” reasonable” Ethics: study of right and wrong behavior Business ethics: study of right and wrong behavior in the business world Moral minimum: the minimum acceptable standard for ethical business behavior, normally considered compliance with the law Corporate Social…